Ash
 |
 Wysany:
Pon 10:21, 08 Lip 2013 Temat postu: UkTRICaoNjiLudlllT |
|
| Coaseho teore9m je v tomto pode1ned opravdu poolcpitehnfd i pro studenty nižšedch ročnedků topedcedch se ještě ve vlne1ch česke9 beletrie:)Ale, je skutečně tak "vedlejšed", kdo zaplated těch 50 babek? Teore9m si doke1žu představit aplikovanfd u soudu nebo ve spre1vnedm ředzened. Je prime1rnedm fačelem tohoto ředzened rozsoudit fačastnedky, nebo najedt řešened, ktere9 je ekonomicky nejvfdhodnějšed pro společnost (hrozne1 formulace:) a pak nechat fačastnedky sporu si o těch padese1t dolarů hodit korunou?Toto če1stečně souvised se zajedmavou ote1zkou, kterou jsme řešili se Stevem Terretem, lektorem v Cambridge diploma in Eng and Europ law. Zda apelačned soud vyne1šed rozsudek předevšedm proto, aby posoudil konre9tned odvole1ned nebo prime1rně proto, aby pro futuro v re1mci ratio decidendi vyrešil "important point of law". odpověď byla ne1sledujedced:"So it is not correct to say that the Court of Appeal needed to decide deciding wheter specificly mr. Collins was aware or not of his trespassing . The only question the Court of Apeal needs to ask itself is: When the jury decided that Mr Collins has trespassed, did they do so on the basis of a proper description of the law of trespass as told to them by the trial judge? Ifthe answer is no , the jury's decision is not safe and the appeal would be allowed. In that sense, the Court of Appeal's judgment has 2 functions: A precedent functionThe Court of Appeal's judgment (or HL's) will answer a particular legal question referred to it from a lower court (e.g. What does trespass mean in s.9 of the Theft Act 1968?). The definition the higher court provides will crfeate a precedent which will be used by lower courts in future cases (and by lawyers and law students when discussing that area of law) An individual function The individual(s) involved in the first-instance trial in which the legal question arose (e.g. Mr Collins) have a personal interest in the answer provided by the higher court. Once the higher court has given its answer, this will impact upon whether the lower court decided the case properly. It may result in the trial court's decision being overruled (as it was in the Collin case)." |
|
